I received a lengthy, and very appreciated comment on a previous post titled "Who Am I?" As I mentioned in the post, it is the cause of some discussion. Instead of commenting on the original, I thought I would revisit the topic by posting her comment, then discussing with my own opinion.
Ashley wrote:
Who am I? I have no idea. I received a “B” in a class titled ‘Understanding the Self’, I second guess myself all the time, and I perpetually change my mind. I’m not qualified, by any means, to explain “What makes you, you?” However, I have put “a little” thought into this, and all I’ve come up with are more questions. Josh, you answered this mystery the best you possibly could in the amount of space allocated. And yes, I think you’re a la carte version as a whole answers the question, but let me pose this to you…
-If you are defined by your memories or simple events, what made you react to that situation the very first time? Doesn’t your personality (which I have read in a peer reviewed journal is 93% genetics) have an influence on your decisions,likes/dislikes, overall demeanor, and interpersonal relationships? In that case, how much free will do we have if we are predisposed to react to certain stimuli due to the configuration of our genes? And, what role do our moods and emotions play in how we respond to people, places, and things. So I ask, biologically, how much of an influence do your genes play in who you are?
-Can you choose to be a “meta-reference” and be “intentionally left blank”? I have heard several stories about people who completely change their life around all by the power of the mind. And don’t some actors actually try to become the character they are playing in a film in order to portray the role accurately? So I ask, how much of an influence does the brain itself have to play in this confounded question? Or does that relate back to your genes?
I believe that I have a soul and that a higher being is leading me down a predestined path; however, I also believe that I have been given the freedom of choice so as to choose how I would like to get from point A to point B of that path. Everything in life happens for a reason. This cause and effect relationship teaches all of us valuable lessons in life and leads us into this state of constant change. Because we are permanently changing will we ever really be able to identify “Who am I?” Sorry, Josh, all I can offer are questions.
My response to Ashley:
Ah, I'm glad you mentioned free will, one of my other favorite topics to discuss, I won't get into it now though. You asked, "How much free will do we have if we are predisposed to react to certain stimuli due to the configuration of our genes?" A well put question indeed. My answer would be that free will has to do with the choice, not the reaction to that choice. Sure, we might be predisposed and have no control on how we will react to the stimuli based on our genes as you said, but we sometimes have a choice of whether or not to engage in that stimuli, that's where free will kicks in. I'll set forth an example. If you had never had onions on your hamburger and you were faced with a choice today: a burger with onions or a burger without onions, you have free will to choose one or the other (theoretically). You choose with onions. The moment you bite into that burger your brain then decides whether it is a favorable or unfavorable reaction to the stimulus of the overall taste of onions. Yuck, you don't like onions. You don't like the feel of them in your mouth, or the smell of them as you chew. That reaction, as you have put forth, may be a genetic disposition. You had no control over the reaction, but you clearly chose to engage in the testing of the stimulus, thus reinstating free will. Now, on a tangential note about choices. The many worlds theory would say that even though you made the choice to get onions on your burger, there is still another version of you out there that at the same time is eating, and enjoying for the sake of our discussion, an onion free burger. All choice possibilities exist in the universe because each and every moment exists and it is our mind in each situation that make the choice we make real.
Now, on to your next question: "Can you choose to be a meta-reference?" I don't think you can choose to be a meta-reference. Instead I think that it is something you can strive for, something you can achieve. A meta-reference has awareness, it knows what it is and it's purpose. So to me, striving to be a meta-reference is the same as striving to know who you are as a person, breaking free of the constructs or script of life and "marching to the beat of your own drum" because that is who you are. Ultimately, that is what we want to achieve, right? Being completely happy and loving who we are no matter the circumstances, knowing our purpose and being aware that we are living and able to acknowledge ourselves as whole. I would like to be a meta-reference in that case.
The fact of the matter is that there is no answer. Even as I write this I can think of 3 to 4 things at least that would falsify or put into serious question everything that I just said, and I didn't even touch on some of your comments due to the length. So in a sense, the search continues and will ever be continuing with the questions. All I can do in the mean time is exist and be the best person I know how to be taught to me by my parents, their parents before them, and the influence of my friends and peers around me. You had it just right. We are in a perpetual state of minuscule changes. It's what keeps us going, letting us know that we exist, we're alive, that we just,
are in the universe. And maybe knowing that is ultimately all that matters.